The Hunger Games: Catching Fire: spoiler-free review

One of the weird things about getting older is the sense that you have read all the stories in the newspaper before. I had a similar experience while watching the dreadful trailers that came on before Catching Fire. Why is it that every fantasy movie these days looks like the Lord of the Rings trilogy?

Thankfully, there is nothing clichéd about the second instalment of The Hunger Games. The film opens without credits and without blaring music. We meet Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) in contemplative mood in the cold Northern woods as she ponders her new-found fame and the undesired role that has been thrust upon her.

The Hunger Games is set in a future USA, divided into zones. The super-rich live a debauched and privileged existence like the aristocrats at the fall of Rome. Meanwhile Katniss’ people are trapped in a kind of giant gulag, where they struggle to find enough to eat in a bleak industrial wasteland. The games themselves take place in a tropical dome, where beautiful beaches and rainforests conceal peril at every turn.

The world feels real. In the same way, the issues are broad-brush, but deep. The Hunger Games has a relentless focus on how the media and entertainment industries are just a pawn to maintain public acceptance of their lot. Meanwhile, the people’s rights are being gradually whittled away. Eventually, drunk on their own power, the authorities sink to outright repression in their desperation to keep the poor in their place.

The films are much cleverer than that initial premise implies. Suzanne Collins is a crafty plotter and I had the sense that she was always one step ahead of the audience. That’s not something you can say about a lot of films these days. The week before, I saw Woody Allen’s Blue Jasmine, which was excellent but still relied on a tired old cliché to get the plot moving (“gasp, he’s having an affair – we’re in the car, he can’t see us and doesn’t know we know, oh he’s kissed her, so it must be true” etc, etc.).

There is a love triangle in Catching Fire too, but it is handled sensitively and with real style. Katniss’s  predicament reminded me of the old Stephen Stills song, “If you can’t be now with the one you love, honey, love the one you’re with”.

Catching Fire is an example of perfect cinema. There is violence but it is never gratuitous. When people die, it has tragic consequences. There is romance, but without overt nudity. Anyone could go and see this film and be entertained throughout. It has old-fashioned strengths such as characters you relate to, a strong plot, an intelligent story, and a first-class villain in President Snow. Donald Sutherland clearly revels in his role as the world’s dictatorial ruler.

If I have one gripe with the movie, it is only a very small one. It’s just that light-hearted moments are few and far between. I know this is drama, but if I’m going to have to sit in the cinema for almost two and a half hours, is it too much to ask for a bit of comic banter, or failing that, just a simple joke?

Moaning over, I loved Catching Fire, the second part of The Hunger Games, and I can’t wait to see parts three and four (the final book is to be split into two films).

Advertisements

4 responses to “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire: spoiler-free review

    • I agree. The first movie was better, perhaps because the Games themselves were so shocking. It’s hard to repeat the games in the second book because the whole point is that you only do them once. Having said that, I thought the characters were better drawn this time around, especially the supporting cast like Peeta and Finnick.

  1. Is this any good, I avoid the books like a cliché because they just seem really bad. Is it worth my time…I trust you more than life itsepf with this answer, so no pressure.

    • They are good, trust me! I haven’t read the books either but the films are great fun. There’s lot of action but with an intelligent story behind it. The cast are great too. I didn’t mention it in my review, but I love Woody Harrelson’s role as a grizzled, hard-drinking vet of the games. He’s come a long, long way since Cheers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s